Ever used one of those smart faucets that seems to cut out exactly when you to rinse your hands? Ever experience a park bench or architecture that feels designed to prevent you from using it? Too often things get designed in ways that hinder a positive experience to account for infrequent edge cases. In this talk Edward Stojakovic presents ways that user experience can be used for good to prevent the proliferation of antipatterns and bad design.
Read MoreMidwest UX 2014 Recap: Make. Mentor. Learn
Have you ever stopped yourself from diving into a new project because you didn't know anything? Do you fear taking on new challenges because you might fail? Todd Zaki Warfel addresses these concerns and more in a wonderful talk about developing your skills, mentorship, and lifelong learning.
Read MoreThe Principles of Beautiful Web Design
The Pleasures of Reading
Common sense defaults
Over the years I have read a large number of pieces advocating the use of sensible defaults. Stephen Anderson's book Seductive Interaction Design devotes two pages to the topic with proof about the why and how (one of many reasons to order a copy as soon as you can).
Today Jared Spool provides even more validation. By performing a simple experiment with Microsoft Word he found that less than 5% of users change any settings. In other words 95% of people touching your product will assume there is a reason that the default settings are configured the way they are. Rather than fix them they'll go with the status quo.
I highly recommend reading the piece when you get a minute. The questions it asks apply not just to those of us trying to design the experience but the people actually writing the code. You may be surprised at all the assumptions that sneak through into the final design.